|
By
Terry
Jackson
If you're selling
or buying a used car, the Internet can be a true blessing.
With a few
strokes of the keyboard, you can find out what a 2001 Mustang
might be worth if you were trading it in, selling it yourself or
buying it from a neighbor or from the corner-used car lot.
But be
forewarned: The operative word in the last sentence is "might"
-- when it comes to determining a specific dollar amount value
for a used vehicle, the Web can also be a jungle of conflicting
numbers. Depending on which site you use, values can vary by
thousands of dollars for seemingly identical cars, in identical
condition.
Bankrate found
this out by taking a test spin on three of the more popular
automotive Web sites --
Kelley Blue Book,
Edmunds.com
and
CarsDirect.com.
Let's say you are
shopping for a 2002 Ford Explorer XLT with two-wheel-drive, V6,
automatic transmission, AM/FM cassette and leather seats with
50,000 miles on the odometer.
Run through the
calculator on Edmunds, and the result says the retail price of
that Explorer should be $10,774. But surf over to Kelley's site,
and the same vehicle comes up with a retail value of $15,040.
So what's up?
Blame differing approaches and internal methods of calculation.
Alex Rosten,
manager of pricing and market analysis for Edmunds, says his
site's prices are derived from a complex calculation using many
sources.
"We use
transaction data from dealers, depreciation rates for individual
models and historical data,'' he says. "There's also some
forecasting involved.''
Robyn Eckard,
director of media relations for Kelley Blue Book, says her site,
which is an evolution from the printed Kelley Blue Book price
guides that dealers have used since 1913, also uses sales data
from dealers, wholesale auctions and other sources.
So what explains
a difference of more than $4,000 on the retail pricing of our
hypothetical 2002 Explorer?
Rosten argues
that in addition to building a better computer model for
figuring these things, the Edmunds site is not as closely
aligned with car dealers as Kelley's. "Their prices are very
dealer-friendly,'' he says, implying that by showing consumers
higher retail prices and, in some cases, lower trade-in values,
it gives a dealer greater leverage.
Eckard flatly
denies that. "We are not out there to make dealers happy,'' she
says, contending that Kelley's prices are more reflective of the
market.
She also contends
that there's no direct comparison possible between Web sites
because they use different definitions and start from different
assumptions. "It's an apples-to-oranges situation,'' she says.
|